LetsVPN speed test: the numbers, and the line they came from
A baseline first, then LetsVPN on the nearest European server and on a long-distance US server, with the full league table of 11 VPNs.
- baseline 294 Mbps
- Europe 70% kept
- US 69% kept
LetsVPN (Kuailian VPN) no longer works in mainland China. The company ended its mainland China service on 28 April 2026 and its CEO has confirmed it cannot serve mainland users any more. The VPN links on this site are the alternatives we recommend instead. Read the full timeline and sources →
The baseline, measured first
With LetsVPN off, the line gave 294 Mbps down, 294 Mbps up and 4 ms ping.
LetsVPN connected: United Kingdom and United States
Same line, same machine, one run per route.
| Connection | Route | Download, Mbps | Upload, Mbps | Ping | Download kept |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No VPN (baseline) | – | 294.32 | 294.41 | 4 ms | 100% |
| United Kingdom | Nearest Europe | 207.02 | 258.89 | 42 ms | 70% |
| United States | Long-distance US | 202.32 | 248.38 | 181 ms | 69% |
How LetsVPN compares with ten other VPNs
Ranked by nearest-European download. Bars are scaled to 300 Mbps, the line's ceiling.
| # | VPN | Europe, Mbps | Ping | US, Mbps | Ping | EU kept |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Proton VPN | 262 | 42 ms | 126 | 174 ms | 89% |
| 2 | hide.me | 222 | 47 ms | 200 | 163 ms | 74% |
| 3 | Windscribe | 222 | 44 ms | 203 | 108 ms | 75% |
| 4 | NordVPN | 210 | 31 ms | 200 | 111 ms | 72% |
| 5 | Surfshark | 210 | 79 ms | 203 | 112 ms | 71% |
| 6 | LetsVPN this site | 207 | 42 ms | 202 | 181 ms | 70% |
| 7 | PrivadoVPN | 200 | 42 ms | 160 | 132 ms | 68% |
| 8 | PureVPN | 200 | 39 ms | 209 | 177 ms | 68% |
| 9 | CyberGhost | 194 | 42 ms | 210 | 126 ms | 66% |
| 10 | ExpressVPN | 181 | 35 ms | 160 | 112 ms | 62% |
| 11 | AdGuard VPN | 136 | 46 ms | 200 | 171 ms | 46% |
The 'European' route is each VPN's nearest European server to the tester, so the country differs between VPNs; the US route is New York for eight of eleven (Los Angeles for hide.me and PureVPN, San Jose for Proton VPN, city not recorded for LetsVPN).
What the numbers say
Four plain observations, each traceable to a capture above.
- On United Kingdom, LetsVPN kept 70.3% of baseline download (207 of 294 Mbps), rank #6 of 11.
- On United States, it kept 68.7% (202 Mbps), rank #5, with ping 181 ms (rank #11 for lowest ping).
- Ping rose by 38 ms on the European route and by 177 ms on the long-distance US route.
- Upload on the European route was 259 Mbps (88% of its baseline); on the US route 248 Mbps (84%).
Two things not to read into these numbers
A speed snapshot is easy to over-read.
Before you quote these numbers
- Different routes: the European server is a different country for each VPN and the protocols differ. Compare gaps, not single values.
- One run: a few percentage points of difference is within normal variation on any day.
Questions people ask
Short answers, based on our own captures and the data on this site.
How fast is LetsVPN?
On the United Kingdom route it delivered 207 Mbps down and 259 Mbps up at 42 ms, which is 70% of our 294 Mbps baseline. On the United States route it delivered 202 Mbps down (69%) at 181 ms.
Did you test LetsVPN against the other VPNs on the same line?
Yes. All 11 VPNs were measured on the same connection, each with its own baseline taken first. LetsVPN ranked #6 of 11 for download on the nearest-European route and #5 on the US route.
Is one speed test enough to rank VPNs?
No. It is a snapshot: one run per route on one day. Use the table to see the size of the gaps, not to crown a winner; a few percentage points is within normal day-to-day variation.
Why do the European servers differ between VPNs?
We used each VPN's nearest European server, so the country varies (for example Paris, London, Frankfurt or Marseille). Distance changes ping, so compare download kept and ping with that in mind.
Compare VPNs side by side
See current plans, prices and refund terms for the VPNs we recommend.